Organising your writing 3. Summary 4. Evaluation 5. Linguistic features of a critical review 6. Summary language 7. Evaluation language 8. Conclusion language 9. Example extracts from a critical review Further resources. Further reading: Read Confidently. After you are familiar with the text, make notes on some of the following questions. Choose the questions which seem suitable:. You first need to summarise the text that you have read. One reason to summarise the text is that the reader may not have read the text. In your summary, you will. In your summary you might answer the following questions: Why is this topic important? Where can this text be located? For example, does it address policy studies?

What other prominent authors also write about this? Use the literature to support your views. You may also use your knowledge of conducting research, and your own experience. Evaluation can be explicit or implicit. Explicit evaluation involves stating directly explicitly how you intend to evaluate the text. First, I will examine the extent to which the authors contribute to current thought on Second Language Acquisition SLA pedagogy. After that, I will analyse whether the authors' propositions are feasible within overseas SLA classrooms. Implicit evaluation is less direct. The following section on Linguistic Features of Writing a Critical Review contains language that evaluates the text.

A difficult part of evaluation of a published text and a professional author is how to do this as a student. There is nothing wrong with making your position as a student explicit and incorporating it into your evaluation. Examples of how you might do this can be found in the section on Linguistic Features of Writing a Critical Review. You need to remember to locate and analyse the author's argument when you are writing your critical review. The following examples come from published critical reviews. Some of them have been adapted for student use. If you have been told your writing is not critical enough, it probably means that your writing treats the knowledge claims as if they are true, well supported, and applicable in the context you are writing about.

This may not always be the case. In these two examples, the extracts refer to the same section of text. To write a good critique paper, it pays to adhere to a smooth flow of thought in your evaluation of the piece. You will need to introduce the topic, analyze, interpret, then conclude it. Introduce the topic of the critique paper. That means, when you write your critique paper, you should be able to answer the Why , When , Where , What , Who , and How questions. Using this approach prevents missing out on the essential details. If you can write a critique paper that adheres to this approach, that would be excellent. The news article by John Doe was a narrative about a bank robbery. Accordingly, a masked man Who robbed a bank What the other day When next to a police station Where.

He did so in broad daylight How. He used a bicycle to escape from the scene of the crime How. In his haste, he bumped into a post. His mask fell off; thus, everyone saw his face allowing witnesses to describe him in detail. As a result, he had difficulty escaping the police, who eventually retrieved his loot and put him in jail because of his wrongdoing Why. Hence, you give details about the topic, in this case, a bank robbery. Briefly describe what you want to tell your audience. State the overall purpose of writing the piece and its intention. Is the essay written to inform, entertain, educate, raise an issue for debate, and so on? And write a paragraph or a few sentences as succinctly as you can. What are the main points of the composition?

How was it structured? Did the view expressed by the author allow you, as the reader, to understand? How do you examine the situation? If you want to split a log, what would you do? Do you use an ax, a chainsaw, or perhaps a knife? The last one is out of the question. Thus, it would be best if you defined the tools of your analysis. Tools facilitate understanding and allow you to make an incisive analysis. Now, you are ready to interpret the article, book, or any composition once the requisites of analysis are in place. Visualize the event in your mind and interpret the behavior of actors in the bank robbery incident. You have several actors in that bank heist: the robber, the police, and the witnesses of the crime.

While reading the story, it might have occurred to you that the robber is inexperienced. We can see some discrepancies in his actions. Imagine, his mode of escape is a bicycle. What got into him? Maybe he did not plan the robbery at all. Besides, there was no mention that the robber used a gun in the heist. That fact confirms the first observation that he was not ready at all. Escaping the scene of the crime using a bicycle without anything to defend himself once pursued? Right after the robber escaped the crime scene, they appeared to remedy the situation. The robber did not put up a fight. They were not afraid. But there was no specific mention about it. Narrate the importance of each of the different sections or paragraphs.

How does the write-up contribute to the overall picture of the issue or problem being studied? Finally, judge whether the article was a worthwhile account after all. Did it meet expectations? Was it able to convey the information most efficiently? Or are there loopholes or flaws that should have been mentioned? The logical format in writing a critique paper consists of at least three sections: the introduction, the body, and the conclusion. This approach is systematic and achieves a good flow that readers can follow.

Include the title and name of the author in your introduction. Find out the thesis or central argument , which will be the basis of your discussion. The robbery example appears to be inappropriate to demonstrate this section as it is so simple. So we level up to a scientific article. In any scientific article, there is always a thesis that guides the write-up. A thesis is a statement that expresses what the author believes in and tries to test in his study. How is the introduction of a critique paper structured? It follows the general guidelines of writing from a broad perspective to more specific concerns or details. The body of the paper includes details about the article being examined. It is here where you place all those musings of yours after applying the analytical tools.

This section is similar to the results and discussion portion of a scientific paper. It describes the outcome of your analysis as well as interpretation. In explaining or expressing your argument, substantiate it by citing references to make it believable. Make sure that those references are relevant as well as timely. These, perhaps, would not amount to a better understanding of the topic at hand. Find one that will help you understand the situation. Besides, who wants to adopt the perspective of an author who has not even got hold of a mobile phone if your paper is about using mobile phones to facilitate learning during the pandemic caused by COVID? Find a more recent one that will help you understand the situation.

Objectively examine the major points presented by the author by giving details about the work. How does the author present or express the idea or concept? I mention the gender issue because the literature says that there is a difference in how a person sees things based on gender.

We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.

Manage Settings Continue with Recommended Cookies. Were you assigned or asked by your professor to write a critique paper? Just so everyone benefits from the guide I prepared for that class, I share it here. To standardize the format they use in writing a critique paper, I came up with the following steps to make their submissions worthwhile. Since they are graduate students, more is expected of them. I quickly wrote this simple guide on writing a critique paper to help you evaluate any composition you want to write about. It could be a book, a scientific article, a gray paper, or whatever your professor assigns.

The essence of the approach is integrated in this article. First, you will need to know the procedure that will guide you in evaluating a paper. Second, the format of the critique paper refers to how you present it so that it becomes logical and scholarly in tone. To write a good critique paper, it pays to adhere to a smooth flow of thought in your evaluation of the piece. You will need to introduce the topic, analyze, interpret, then conclude it. Introduce the topic of the critique paper. That means, when you write your critique paper, you should be able to answer the Why , When , Where , What , Who , and How questions.

Using this approach prevents missing out on the essential details. If you can write a critique paper that adheres to this approach, that would be excellent. The news article by John Doe was a narrative about a bank robbery. Accordingly, a masked man Who robbed a bank What the other day When next to a police station Where. He did so in broad daylight How. He used a bicycle to escape from the scene of the crime How. In his haste, he bumped into a post. His mask fell off; thus, everyone saw his face allowing witnesses to describe him in detail. As a result, he had difficulty escaping the police, who eventually retrieved his loot and put him in jail because of his wrongdoing Why.

Hence, you give details about the topic, in this case, a bank robbery. Briefly describe what you want to tell your audience. State the overall purpose of writing the piece and its intention. Is the essay written to inform, entertain, educate, raise an issue for debate, and so on? And write a paragraph or a few sentences as succinctly as you can. What are the main points of the composition? How was it structured? Did the view expressed by the author allow you, as the reader, to understand? How do you examine the situation? If you want to split a log, what would you do? Do you use an ax, a chainsaw, or perhaps a knife?

The last one is out of the question. Thus, it would be best if you defined the tools of your analysis. Tools facilitate understanding and allow you to make an incisive analysis. Now, you are ready to interpret the article, book, or any composition once the requisites of analysis are in place. Visualize the event in your mind and interpret the behavior of actors in the bank robbery incident. You have several actors in that bank heist: the robber, the police, and the witnesses of the crime. While reading the story, it might have occurred to you that the robber is inexperienced. We can see some discrepancies in his actions. Imagine, his mode of escape is a bicycle. What got into him? Maybe he did not plan the robbery at all.

Besides, there was no mention that the robber used a gun in the heist. That fact confirms the first observation that he was not ready at all. Escaping the scene of the crime using a bicycle without anything to defend himself once pursued? Right after the robber escaped the crime scene, they appeared to remedy the situation. The robber did not put up a fight. They were not afraid. But there was no specific mention about it. Narrate the importance of each of the different sections or paragraphs. How does the write-up contribute to the overall picture of the issue or problem being studied? Finally, judge whether the article was a worthwhile account after all. Did it meet expectations? Was it able to convey the information most efficiently?

Or are there loopholes or flaws that should have been mentioned? The logical format in writing a critique paper consists of at least three sections: the introduction, the body, and the conclusion. This approach is systematic and achieves a good flow that readers can follow. Include the title and name of the author in your introduction. Find out the thesis or central argument , which will be the basis of your discussion. The robbery example appears to be inappropriate to demonstrate this section as it is so simple.

So we level up to a scientific article. In any scientific article, there is always a thesis that guides the write-up. A thesis is a statement that expresses what the author believes in and tries to test in his study. How is the introduction of a critique paper structured? It follows the general guidelines of writing from a broad perspective to more specific concerns or details. The body of the paper includes details about the article being examined. It is here where you place all those musings of yours after applying the analytical tools. This section is similar to the results and discussion portion of a scientific paper. It describes the outcome of your analysis as well as interpretation. In explaining or expressing your argument, substantiate it by citing references to make it believable.

Make sure that those references are relevant as well as timely. These, perhaps, would not amount to a better understanding of the topic at hand. Find one that will help you understand the situation. Besides, who wants to adopt the perspective of an author who has not even got hold of a mobile phone if your paper is about using mobile phones to facilitate learning during the pandemic caused by COVID? Find a more recent one that will help you understand the situation. Objectively examine the major points presented by the author by giving details about the work.

How does the author present or express the idea or concept? I mention the gender issue because the literature says that there is a difference in how a person sees things based on gender. My point is just that there is a difference in perspective between men and women. Therefore, always find evidence to support your position. Explain why you agree or disagree with the author. Point out the discrepancies or strengths of the paper. Well, everything has an end. Write a critique paper that incorporates the key takeaways of the document examined. End the critique with an overall interpretation of the article, whatever that is. Why do you think is the paper relevant in the context of the course that you are taking? How does it contribute to say, the study of human behavior in reference to the bank robbery?

Are there areas that need to be considered by future researchers, investigators, or scientists? That will be the knowledge gap that the next generation of researchers will have to look into. If you have read up to this point, then thank you for reading my musings.

Critiques use formal and academic writing styles. July 10, Research Paper Writers Write My Research Papers Buy a Research Paper Buy a Term Paper Write My Term Papers Professional Term Paper Writers. When reading and re-reading the article, find and highlight cases in which the author overstates the importance of some things due to his or her own beliefs. Detroit schools to use bottled water due to lead, copper concerns.

Categories:

• Essay Experts
• Custom Essays
• Essay Online
• Essay Website
• Online Essays